Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Sheldon A. Weiss argued the cause for appellant. Mr. Robert O. Brokaw argued the cause for respondent Jersey Central Power Light Company. Mr. Howard T. Rosen argued the cause for respondent Public Service Electric Gas Company ( Messrs. Rosen, Gelman Weiss, attorneys; Mr. Rosen and Mr. Sidney D. Weiss, of counsel; Mr. William J. Balcerski, on the brief). Mr. Thomas J. Cafferty submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Township of Franklin ( Messrs. Seiffert, Frisch, McGimpsey Cafferty, attorneys). Mr. John R. Miller submitted a letter brief on behalf of amicus curiae Township of Chatham.
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
  • SULLIVAN and PASHMAN, JJ., dissenting:
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Sheldon A. Weiss argued the cause for appellant. Mr. Robert O. Brokaw argued the cause for respondent Jersey Central Power Light Company. Mr. Howard T. Rosen argued the cause for respondent Public Service Electric Gas Company ( Messrs. Rosen, Gelman Weiss, attorneys; Mr. Rosen and Mr. Sidney D. Weiss, of counsel; Mr. William J. Balcerski, on the brief). Mr. Thomas J. Cafferty submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Township of Franklin ( Messrs. Seiffert, Frisch, McGimpsey Cafferty, attorneys). Mr. John R. Miller submitted a letter brief on behalf of amicus curiae Township of Chatham.
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
  • SULLIVAN and PASHMAN, JJ., dissenting:
See more information ...
Smart Summary

TOWNSHIP OF TEWKSBURY, APPELLANT, v. JERSEY CENTRAL POWER LIGHT COMPANYAND PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC GAS COMPANY, RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 159 N.J. Super. 44.

SULLIVAN and PASHMAN, JJ., dissenting:

We would reverse the judgment below substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Larner in the Appellate Division, reported at 159 N.J. Super. 44, 52. For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 4.

For reversal — Justices SULLIVAN and PASHMAN — 2.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

TP. OF TEWKSBURY v. JERSEY CENTRAL POWER LIGHT CO
(Apr 6, 1979)