Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

William L. Pardini, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsyl

Unemployment compensation — Self-employment — Corporate control — Unemployment Compensation Law, Act 1936, December 5, P.L. (1937) 2897.

1. A corporate officer, holding a substantial amount of the stock in the corporation, serving on its board of directors and exercising a substantial degree of control over the corporate operation, is considered to be self-employed and ineligible for benefits under the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act 1936, December 5. P.L. (1937) 2897, when such employment ceases. [115]

OPINION BY JUDGE CRAIG, April 19, 1979:

Claimant appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying him benefits under Section 402(h) of the Unemployment Compensation Law on the ground that his former work had been self-employment.

Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P. S. § 802(h) (disqualifies self-employed persons).

The record shows that claimant owned fifty percent of the outstanding stock of Standard Metal Products, Inc. Serving as secretary-treasurer of the corporation and as a member of the board of directors, claimant was the company's general manager, until the corporation's bankruptcy on February 1, 1977.

This case is controlled by Kerns v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 28 Pa. Commw. 48, 367 A.2d 334 (1976), where we held that ownership of one-quarter of the corporation's outstanding stock and membership on its board of directors, coupled with the status of corporate officer, were sufficient to establish that claimant had that "substantial degree of control" over the corporation's operation which constituted self-employment, making him ineligible for compensation benefits under the rule articulated in Starinieri Unemployment Compensation Case, 447 Pa. 256, 289 A.2d 726 (1972).

We affirm the order of the Board denying claimant benefits.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 1979, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, No. B-147615, dated July 19, 1977, is affirmed and claimant's appeal is dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PARDINI v. UNEMPL. COMP. BD. of REVIEW
(Apr 19, 1979)