Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Estate of LEO K. McMANUS, Deceased. JOSEPH M. McMANUS, SR., Respondent; VIRGINIA A. McMANUS, as Executrix of LEO K. McMANUS, Deceased, Appellant. In the Matter of the Estate of MARY F. McMANUS, Deceased. JOSEPH M. McMANUS, SR., et al., Respondents; LEO K. McMANUS, as Executor of MARY F. McMANUS, Deceased, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Inasmuch as appellants and their predecessors in interest were not beneficially interested in the trust created in the will of John J. McManus, who died in 1935, they lack standing to challenge the actions of its trustee (Cashman v Petrie, 14 N.Y.2d 426, 430). Accordingly, their allegation that a breach of trust occurred in 1941, when the trustee transferred the corpus of the trust, was properly rejected.

Given this disposition of the matter, we need not decide whether the conduct of the trustee comported with the terms of the trust, but if we were to reach the question, because of the special situation presented here, we state that we would affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice JAMES D. HOPKINS at the Appellate Division.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF McMANUS
(Apr 24, 1979)