Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. HARRY CORREA, Respondent.

Order reversed for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Mr. Justice JAMES D. HOPKINS at the Appellate Division ( 56 A.D.2d 935; see, also, People v McLaurin, 43 N.Y.2d 902; and People v Kinlock, 43 N.Y.2d 832), noting that if consent had been refused such fact should not be taken into consideration in determining whether there was probable cause; and the case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for review of the facts (CPL 470.25, subd 2, par [d]; 470.40, subd 2, par [b]).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HARRY CORREA
(May 31, 1979)