Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SHINHOLSTER v. THE STATE.

QUILLIAN, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Held:

1. Error is assigned to the denial of the defendant's motion to change of venue or a continuance based on allegedly prejudicial pre-trial publicity.

"The law in Georgia is well established, and a myriad of cases so hold, that a motion for a change of venue addresses itself to the sound discretion of the trial judge, and that discretion will not be disturbed on appeal unless it can be shown that there was an abuse of this discretion." Coleman v. State, 237 Ga. 84, 90 ( 226 S.E.2d 911). "The test regarding prejudicial pre-trial publicity is whether the jurors summoned to try the case have formed fixed opinions as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant from their exposure to the pre-trial publicity." Potts v. State, 241 Ga. 67, 76 ( 243 S.E.2d 510).

The proof offered failed to establish actual prejudice to a degree that rendered a fair trial impossible. Watts v. State, 141 Ga. App. 127, 129 (3) ( 232 S.E.2d 590). We find no abuse of discretion in denying the motion.

2. The trial judge did not err in refusing to declare a mistrial. Judgment affirmed. Smith and Birdsong, JJ., concur.

ARGUED MAY 9, 1979 — DECIDED JUNE 5, 1979.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHINHOLSTER v. STATE
(Jun 5, 1979)