Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of RICHARD BUONO et al., Appellants, v. VICTOR S. BAHOU et al., Constituting the New York State Ci

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court, Albany County, with directions to remand to the State Civil Service Commission for a hearing.

While we are in agreement with the Appellate Division that respondent State Civil Service Commission could act, pursuant to section 25 of the Civil Service Law, to rescind the appointments of petitioners as police officers in the City of Rensselaer, we are of the opinion that petitioners are entitled to a hearing on the issue whether they had submitted to physical examinations prior to their appointments and satisfied the visual acuity standards established by law. Inasmuch as petitioners made timely requests for such hearings and in light of the drastic consequences which may befall petitioners by the rescission of their appointments, petitioners must be accorded the opportunity to present proof at a plenary hearing to substantiate their allegations that they had satisfied the visual acuity standard, as verified by duly performed medical examinations, prior to their appointment. (Cf. Matter of Canarelli v New York State Dept. of Civ. Serv., 44 A.D.2d 645; Matter of McShane v City Civ. Serv. Comm., 51 A.D.2d 521.)

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF BUONO v. BAHOU
(Jul 3, 1979)