Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARK A. HERMAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

The State filed a seven-count information charging defendant with possession of various drugs, narcotic paraphernalia and weapons. The case proceeded to trial on an amended information. There was no objection to the amended information or any other motions filed. No motion to suppress the seized evidence consisting of drugs, paraphernalia and weapons was made. At trial there was no evidentiary objection based on an illegal search or seizure. Defendant was convicted on all counts.

Defendant raises seven points on appeal before this court. We affirm. The points regarding admission of evidence are not adequately preserved for review, and all others are without merit.

We have considered the briefs, the record, and the transcript and find that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The judgment and sentence is, therefore, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, C.J., and CROSS and BERANEK, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HERMAN v. STATE
(Jul 11, 1979)