Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Robert F. HANSEL, Jr., Administrator d/b/n/c/t/a of the Estate of RobertF. Hansel, Sr., Deceased, Appellant, v. Girard HANSEL and Leon Hansel, asCo-Executors under Will of Stephan R. Hansel, Deceased, and Helen E.Hansel, Indi

WIEAND, Judge:

In this equity action the trial court concluded that an alleged cause of action was barred by laches and sustained preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to the complaint. Appellant contends that this was error. We agree and reverse.

Laches means undue delay. Under Pa.R.C.P. No. 1030, laches is an affirmative defense which must be set forth in a responsive pleading under the heading of "New Matter." Sanctis v. Lagerbusch, 213 Pa. Super. 483, 249 A.2d 919 (1968). It cannot be raised by demurrer. Goodrich-Amram 2d, § 1030:1.3; Strollo v. Domenick, 3 Pa. D. C.2d 715 (1955). See also: Suraci v. Ball, 160 Pa. Super. 349, 354, 51 A.2d 404, 407 (1947).

The trial court's determination that appellant's alleged cause of action was barred by laches, therefore, was premature and must be reversed.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HANSEL v. HANSEL
(Jul 25, 1979)