Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Robert Terrill LOVE, Defendant and Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The State has attempted to appeal from the trial court's dismissal of charges alleging that defendant had violated the provisions of SDCL 22-23-8 by paying for the transportation of a person into the State of South Dakota for the purpose of engaging in prostitution and by transporting a person into this state for the purpose of engaging in prostitution.

We conclude that in the light of our decisions in State v. Texley, 275 N.W.2d 872 (S.D. 1979), and State v. Nuwi Nini, 262 N.W.2d 758 (S.D. 1978), we have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. LOVE
(Aug 15, 1979)