AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

EDGEFIELD COUNTY HOSPITAL TRUSTEES, Plaintiffs, v. CANNON CONSTRUCTION ANDSUPPLY COMPANY, INC., Respondents, and Lafaye, Lafaye and Associates, PoundRoofing Company, Inc. and Bird and Son, Inc., Defendants. Appeal of BIRDAND SON, INC.

August 8, 1979.

Per Curiam:

At the commencement of this action, the plaintiffs, Edgefield County Hospital Trustees, made Cannon Construction and Supply Company, Inc. the sole defendant. Thereafter, the circuit judge, with the consent of both the plaintiffs and the sole defendant, made Lafaye, Lafaye and Associates, Pound Roofing Company, Inc., and Bird and Son, Inc. parties-defendant, so as to allow the defendant Cannon to interpose a cross-action. Bird and Son, Inc. has appealed, submitting that the judge erred in adding it as a party-defendant without notice and opportunity to be heard.

Two basic determinations by this court are dispositive of all issues. First, is the order appealable? and, if appealable, secondly, did the trial judge err? Both issues are decided adversely to the appellant. Traditionally, under our procedures, parties have been added without notice and opportunity to be heard. There is no statutory law requiring notice. The selection of parties-defendant is basically a matter for determination by the claimant, and counsel for a claimant need not notify one in advance that he will be sued.

While we think that the order was not appealable, inasmuch as the matter is before us, we additionally rule that the lower court did not err. Mack Mfg. Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co., 108 S.C. 163, 93 S.E. 713 (1917).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EDGEFIELD C'Y HOS. TRUS. v. CANNON CONST. SUP
(Aug 8, 1979)