Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROYLE v. THE STATE.

SHULMAN, Judge.

Defendant was indicted for the offenses of driving under the influence, reckless driving and speeding. Defendant appeals, pro se, the judgment of the trial court entered in accordance with a jury verdict of guilty on all counts. We affirm.

As appellant has failed to present argument or authorities in support of his contentions of error, such contentions are deemed abandoned. Terrell v. State, 138 Ga. App. 74 (5) ( 225 S.E.2d 470).

We have nonetheless reviewed the judgment on the general grounds. As there was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict of guilty (on all counts), we must affirm the judgment of the court below. Ridley v. State, 236 Ga. 147 (1) ( 223 S.E.2d 131).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

SHULMAN, Judge.

ARGUED APRIL 11, 1979 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 4, 1979 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROYLE v. STATE
(Sep 4, 1979)