AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM REYNOLDS, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered February 17, 1978, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender. Judgment affirmed. Upon review of the instant record, we find that the trial court properly denied the defendant's motion to suppress, without a hearing. In an affirmation submitted in support of the motion, defense counsel averred only that "defendant may have been interrogated by detectives in a manner calculated to deprive the defendant of his constitutional rights". Since this conclusory statement was not supported by any allegations of fact, summary denial of the application was appropriate (see CPL 710.60, subd 3; People v. Roberto H., 67 A.D.2d 549). Under the circumstances, we do not reach the question of whether defendant waived his right to seek review of the denial of the suppression motion. Shapiro, J.P., Cohalan, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. REYNOLDS
(Sep 24, 1979)