Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STEPHENS v. STEPHENS.

BOWLES, Justice.

The parties in this case were divorced in October of 1977. Appellant, Bernice A. Stephens, was awarded custody of the parties' minor daughter (presently four-and-one-half years old) and appellee, Eugene Garrett Stephens, was ordered to pay child support and was given visitation rights. Mrs. Stephens brought a contempt action against Mr. Stephens for failure to pay child support. Mr. Stephens brought a contempt action against Mrs. Stephens for failure to permit visitation. Mrs. Stephens also made a motion to modify visitation to provide for Mr. Stephens' visits with his child to be limited and supervised. At the hearing both parties were found in contempt and ordered to comply with the provisions of the divorce decree. The trial court refused to modify visitation saying: "There has been no substantial change in condition since the time of this Court's Final Judgment And Decree Of Divorce in this case such as would justify a modification of the Defendant's visitation rights." Only the refusal to modify visitation has been appealed.

We reverse.

Under Code Ann. § 30-127 (Ga. L. 1957, pp. 412, 413; 1962, pp. 713, 714; 1976, p. 1050; 1978, pp. 258, 272, eff. Jan. 1, 1979) and the cases interpreting it, a trial judge may modify visitation rights once in each two-year period following the date of the entry of the judgment without any showing of a change in conditions or circumstances of the parties. See Sampson v. Sampson, 240 Ga. 118 ( 239 S.E.2d 519) (1977); Nipper v. Rich, 241 Ga. 123 ( 244 S.E.2d 237) (1978). Since the trial court applied an improper standard in reaching its decision, this case must be reversed to permit the judge the opportunity of exercising a proper discretion.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.

BOWLES, Justice.

SUBMITTED AUGUST 30, 1979 — DECIDED OCTOBER 16, 1979.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STEPHENS v. STEPHENS
(Oct 16, 1979)