Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Motions
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Motions
Attorney(S)

ARTHUR M. EPSTEIN, Appellant, v. KOSIN SIRIVEJKUL et al., Defendants, and CHARLES E. BRIENT, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In granting the motion to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law or in exercising that discretion fail to take into account all the various factors entitled to consideration (Irrigation Ind. Dev. Corp. v Indag S.A., 37 N.Y.2d 522, 525).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EPSTEIN v. SIRIVEJKUL
(Oct 25, 1979)