Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF OTONICAR.

PER CURIAM.

The findings of the State Disciplinary Board that the respondent wilfully misrepresented the status of a claim he had been employed to pursue violated Standard 4 of State Bar Rule 4-102, and disregarded a legal matter entrusted to him violated Standard 44 of State Bar Rule 4-102, are affirmed.

In accordance with the recommendation of the State Disciplinary Board, it is ordered that the respondent receive a public reprimand before the Superior Court of Fulton County.

All the Justices concur.

PER CURIAM.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 7, 1979.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF OTONICAR
(Nov 7, 1979)