Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

LAWRENCE RUFF, an Infant, by FREDERICK H. RUFF, JR., His Father and Natural Guardian, et al., Respondents, v. LOUISE SNYDER et al., Appellants.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Mr. Justice PAUL T. KANE.

We would note that at the time of this trial, proof of freedom from contributory negligence was a necessary element of the infant plaintiff's case. Even if there were adequate evidence of the plaintiff's amnesia, permitting a lower degree of proof of this element (Schechter v Klanfer, 28 N.Y.2d 228), no request was made for this charge, nor was any objection made to the charge that the plaintiff had the standard burden. The unexcepted to charge became the law of the case (Olsen v Chase Manhattan Bank, 9 N.Y.2d 829).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUFF v. SNYDER
(Nov 13, 1979)