Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsyl v. nia

DOWLING, Judge:

This is an appeal from a conviction for a speeding violation. The appellant has stipulated to all the facts necessary to sustain his conviction. The sole issue presented for review is whether the lower court was correct in holding that the arresting officers were authorized under the Vehicle Code to use a stopwatch for determining the speed of appellant's vehicle over a measured distance of 1/8 mile.

Act of 1976, June 17, P.L. 162, No. 81, § 1, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3362.

Act of 1976, June 17, P.L. 162, No. 81, § 1, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 101 et seq.

Section 3368 of the Vehicle Code empowers police officers to use speed timing devices of a type approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. On October 28, 1978, the Transportation Department adopted certain amendments to 67 Pa. Code § Chapter 337, Subchapter E, § 337.31-35, promulgated for the purpose of further implementing Section 3368 of the Vehicle Code. These regulations explicitly approve of properly calibrated and officially tested stopwatches for use as mechanical speed timing devices. Although the incident in question predated the adoption of these regulations, the particular stopwatch used had been duly tested for accuracy within sixty days prior to the appellant's arrest, as required under 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3368(d) of the Vehicle Code. Accordingly, we find that the appellant is out of time.

Volume 81, Pennsylvania Bulletin, page 2918.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

PRICE, J., concurs in result.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COM. v. MANNY
(Nov 16, 1979)