SHULMAN, Judge.
The sole enumeration of error in this appeal from appellants' convictions of armed robbery is on the general grounds. Since the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, would have authorized a jury to find appellants guilty of armed robbery beyond a reasonable doubt, the judgment is affirmed under Rule 36 of the rules of this court (Code Ann. § 24-3636).
Judgment affirmed. Deen, C. J., and Carley, J., concur.
SHULMAN, Judge.
SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 5, 1979 — DECIDED DECEMBER 3, 1979.