Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES RICHARD JOHNSON, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The circumstances of defendant's flight from and apprehension by the police investigating the burglary charge supported the inference that he had possessed the drugs found sandwiched between his wallet and notebook under a couch cushion at the scene of the arrest. Thus, proof of the burglary "would be material and admissible as evidence in chief upon a trial of" the possession count (CPL 200.20, subd 2, par [b]). We cannot say that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to sever these intimately connected crimes for trial (cf. People v Munger, 24 N.Y.2d 445, 449).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. JOHNSON
(Dec 13, 1979)