Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of CHARLES J. WILCOX, as District Attorney of Rensselaer County, Respondent, v. M. ANDREW DWYER, JR., as Judge of the County Court of Rensselaer County, et al., Appellants, and CLINTON SADDLEMIRE, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the petition dismissed, without costs. The People may appeal from the sentence (CPL 450.20, subd 4; 450.30, subd 2). On the appeal they may argue that procedures prescribed by statute were not followed at the sentencing (People v Yanicelli, 33 N.Y.2d 621, 40 N.Y.2d 598). That would include a claim that the court improperly denied the People access to the presentencing report by misinterpreting CPL 390.50 (subd 2). In view of the fact that the issue may be raised on direct appeal, it was error for the Appellate Division to have entertained the application for article 78 relief in the nature of prohibition.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF WILCOX v. DWYER
(Jan 8, 1980)