Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Lloyd SMITH, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW of the Commonwealth of Pennsyl

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

After a studied consideration of the records, together with the briefs and arguments of counsel, we find nothing sufficiently persuasive to cause us to disturb the orders of the Commonwealth Court in these cases.

The orders 40 Pa. Commw. 1, 396 A.2d 480, 40 Pa. Commw. 11, 396 A.2d 94, 39 Pa. Commw. 404, 395 A.2d 675, 39 Pa. Commw. 408, 395 A.2d 667, 37 Pa. Commw. 73, 388 A.2d 1154, are affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SMITH v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMP. BD., ETC
(Jan 18, 1980)