MILLER v. STATE

UNDERCOFLER, Presiding Justice.

This habeas corpus was filed to contest an extradition on the ground that Miller was not in the demanding state (Missouri) at the time of the alleged offense. Miller's attorney has filed an Anders motion to this appeal because his defense no longer is viable after Michigan v. Doran, ___ U.S. ___ ( 99 S.C. 530, 58 L.Ed.2d 521) (1978). Smith v. Hart, 243 Ga. 59 ( 252 S.E.2d 470) (1979); Frazier v. Rutledge, 243 Ga. 39 ( 252 S.E.2d 465) (1979). We have reviewed the record on appeal and both affirm the denial of habeas relief and deny counsel's motion to withdraw.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.