Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ELEANORE HIGGINBOTHAN ARETZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. THOMAS F. ARETZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion Oct. 15, 1979, 5 Cir., 1979, 604 F.2d 417).

BY THE COURT;

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ARETZ v. UNITED STATES
(Apr 15, 1980)