Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CHAIM GROSZ, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. There is competent substantial evidence to support the conviction of appellant for violation of the zoning ordinance which makes no provisions for the operation/maintenance of a church or synagogue in an RS-4 District; that is, a neighborhood that consists of single-family detached dwelling units. See Town v. State, 377 So.2d 648 (Fla. 1979); Pylant v. Orange County, 328 So.2d 199 (Fla. 1976); Smith v. City of Miami Beach, 213 So.2d 281 (Fla.3d DCA 1968), cert. discharged, 220 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1969); City of Miami Beach v. Greater Miami Hebrew Academy, 108 So.2d 50 (Fla.3d DCA 1959), cert. denied, 113 So.2d 229 (Fla. 1959); Miami Beach United Lutheran Church of the Epiphany v. City of Miami Beach, 82 So.2d 880 (Fla. 1955); Sections 6-1A, 6-1B 1 and 14-1(d) of the City of Miami Beach Zoning Ordinance No. 1891.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GROSZ v. STATE
(Apr 11, 1980)