Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. AGOSTINO FIORETTI, Also Known as AUGIE, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered as to appellant for the reasons stated in Part B of the opinion by Mr. Justice J. IRWIN SHAPIRO at the Appellate Division (68 A.D.2d, at pp 574-578). The trial court having made no meaningful inquiry on the record to ascertain whether appellant was cognizant of the potential risks inherent in his representation by the same counsel as his codefendant, the significant possibility of a conflict of interest arising out of the differing types and quantum of evidence against each, including the disincentive to calling appellant to the stand despite his lack of a criminal record, mandates reversal of his conviction (People v Macerola, 47 N.Y.2d 257; see, also, People v Baffi, 49 N.Y.2d 820).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order reversed and a new trial ordered in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. FIORETTI
(Apr 24, 1980)