Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GAIL SUSAN BONIFAY, APPELLANT, v. JOHN O. BONIFAY, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

We believe the trial court erred in directing in the final judgment of dissolution that the marital house of the parties be sold. The pleadings were insufficient to sustain an order of partition; and even if partition had been properly requested, the court would have been bound to proceed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 64, Florida Statutes (1979) as to the manner of sale. Sanders v. Sanders, 351 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Niemann v. Niemann, 294 So.2d 415 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), cert. discharged 312 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1975). Accordingly, the final judgment is reversed and remanded with directions for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

ANSTEAD, MOORE and BERANEK, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BONIFAY v. BONIFAY
(May 14, 1980)