Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES PRINCE, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, defendant's statement to Assistant District Attorney Friedman suppressed and a new trial ordered.

It being undisputed that defendant's second statement was made in custody after he had requested the assistance of counsel, suppression of that statement is required (People v Cunningham, 49 N.Y.2d 203). In the circumstances here presented, reception of that tainted statement into evidence cannot be deemed harmless error (see People v Garofolo, 46 N.Y.2d 592). We have examined defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PRINCE
(Jun 5, 1980)