Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

LEE WOLF, Respondent, v. BERNICE WOHL, Appellant

MEMORANDUM.

Order is unanimously reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed.

A lease is both a contract and a conveyance of an estate or interest in land (1 Rasch, New York Landlord and Tenant [2d ed], §§ 2, 3). Since the lease and occupancy of the apartment are inextricably related to the sale of shares in the co-operative corporation (see Matter of State Tax Comm. v Shor, 43 N.Y.2d 151, 157; Frank v Rubin, 59 Misc.2d 796), a contract to pay compensation for services rendered in negotiating the sale of such shares comes within the purview of section 5-701 Gen. Oblig. of the General Obligations Law and section 442-d Real Prop. of the Real Property Law (see Frank v Rubin, supra; Sebel v Williams, 88 Misc.2d 411). The plaintiff herein was not a licensed real estate broker or a salesperson and the agreement to pay commission was not in writing. Accordingly, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover commissions.

Concur: PITTONI, P.J., SLIFKIN and O'GORMAN, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WOLF v. WOHL
(Jun 19, 1980)