Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE WESTGATE-CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. PEPPERLAND, INC., BONSALL HIGHLANDS ESTATES, INC., KEYSTONE BROKERAGE COMPANY, PACIFIC VIEW CONDOMINIUMS, INC., SAN LUIS REY ESTATES, SAN LUIS REY DOWNS, INC., AND URICK HOLLIS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. WESTGATE-CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM:Page 984

In this appeal from Chapter X proceedings of the Bankruptcy Act, the record demonstrates that the district judge did not abuse his discretion in dismissing amended proofs of claim.

The amended proofs were filed after the last day for filing claims against each of the debtors had passed. They cannot relate back to the date of the original proofs because the original claims did not give fair notice of the conduct, transaction or occurrence that forms the basis of the claim asserted in the amendment. In re Ebeling, 123 F.2d 520 (7th Cir. 1941).

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE WESTGATE-CALIFORNIA CORP
(Jun 18, 1980)