Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM JENKINS, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

It was permissible to join the two robberies in a single indictment because the offenses were "the same or similar in law" (CPL 200.20, subd 2, par [c]). The defendant's motion to sever was addressed to the trial court's discretion (CPL 200.20, subd 3). On this record it cannot be said that the court abused its discretion as a matter of law in denying the defendant's motion for a severance.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. JENKINS
(Jun 26, 1980)