Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF BRONSON (two cases).

PER CURIAM.

After a hearing the Special Master and the State Disciplinary Board found the respondent in File No. 58 in violation of Standard 44 of Rule 4-102 of the State Bar of Georgia in that he had wilfully abandoned a legal matter entrusted to him.

In File No. 35 the respondent was found to be in violation of Standard 4 of Rule 4-102 in "that upon dismissal of the action he took absolutely no measures to notify his client that the dismissal had occurred," and that he was also in violation of Standard 44 of Rule 4-102.

The State Disciplinary Board recommended in both instances that the respondent be given a public reprimand. The respondent has not filed any exceptions in this court to this recommendation.

After a review of the record we adopt the recommendation of the State Disciplinary Board. The Chairman of that Board is authorized and directed to prepare a public reprimand to be read in open court by a judge of the superior court in the county of respondent's residence and in respondent's presence, pursuant to Rule 4-220 (a) of the State Bar of Georgia.

All the Justices concur.

DECIDED JULY 2, 1980.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN MATTER OF BRONSON
(Jul 2, 1980)