Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS CUEVAS, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

The court may upon application by the prosecutor exclude the public from a portion of the trial during the testimony of an undercover agent in order to protect the integrity of pending investigations, as well as the witness' future usefulness, or to insure his safety from possible reprisals. The principles and procedures applicable to such a motion have been discussed at length in our prior decisions (see, e.g., People v Hinton, 31 N.Y.2d 71; People v Jones, 47 N.Y.2d 409).

Here the District Attorney sought to have the courtroom closed solely on his representation that the witness was an undercover officer. Although the court questioned the prosecutor prior to granting the motion, it erred by failing to make an adequate inquiry of the witness, as well as the factual findings prescribed in People v Jones (supra).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CUEVAS
(Jul 3, 1980)