Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE, EX REL. CORONA, APPELLANT, v. HARRIS, JUDGE, APPELLEE.

Mandamus — To compel signing of narrative statement — App. R. 9(C) — Complaint dismissed, when.

Per Curiam.

App. R. 9(C) provides for narrative statements only "[i]f no report of the evidence or proceedings at a hearing or trial was made, or if a transcript is unavailable***."

Appellant's complaint does not allege that a verbatim statement of the Juvenile Court proceedings cannot be provided; and appellant concedes that if a verbatim statement exists, there is no need for a narrative statement.

Until it is clearly established that no verbatim transcript can be provided, appellee has no clear legal duty to sign and settle the narrative statement.

For reason of the foregoing, the judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the mandamus complaint, is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

CELEBREZZE, C.J., HERBERT, W. BROWN, P. BROWN, SWEENEY, LOCHER and HOLMES, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE, EX REL. CORONA, v. HARRIS
(Jul 9, 1980)