Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HAROLD EDWARD STALLINS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

The State filed an information against Harold Stallins, a juvenile, pursuant to Section 39.04(2)(e)4, Florida Statutes (1979). Stallins contends that the trial court committed reversible error in not sentencing him pursuant to Section 39.111(6)(c)1-6, Florida Statutes (1979).

Section 39.111(6), Florida Statutes (1979), requires that a trial court, when imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile, make findings of fact and evaluate the juvenile based on the criteria in Section 39.111(6)(c), Florida Statutes (1979). The record here reveals that Stallins was not sentenced in conformance with that statute.

There being no merit to the other point raised on appeal, we affirm the judgment of the trial court but vacate the sentence. The case is remanded for resentencing pursuant to Section 39.111(6). State v. Cain, 381 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 1980).

GRIMES, Acting C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STALLINS v. STATE
(Jul 16, 1980)