AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of GISELA I. GOLDSTEIN, Respondent, v. ELIO A. PESATO, Appellant.

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated September 6, 1979, which, after a hearing, granted petitioner's application to increase child support payments. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remitted to the Family Court for a new hearing in accordance herewith. Although petitioner had pleaded both an increase in the needs of the children and in the appellant's income, she failed to prove the former at the fact-finding hearing in this matter. Consequently, the Family Court based its order for an upward modification of child support on the sole fact that appellant's income had increased substantially from the time of the separation agreement and of the judgment of divorce. This was error. It has been firmly held that under Matter of Boden v. Boden ( 42 N.Y.2d 210) an increase in the means of a noncustodial parent, standing alone, is not sufficient to warrant an upward modification of child support. (Edwards v. Edwards, 62 A.D.2d 1027, 1028; see, also, Matter of Gould v. Hannan, 44 N.Y.2d 932, 933.) Damiani, J.P., Mangano, Rabin and Margett, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF GOLDSTEIN v. PESATO
(Aug 4, 1980)