Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BRUCE MILLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. N.S. SMITH, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS MEMBER OF DALLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

In our opinion in this case, 615 F.2d 1037 (1980), the majority held that the plaintiff was entitled to invoke the tolling provisions of the Texas state statutes, Vernon's Ann. Tex.Civ.St. arts. 5526. 5535, with reference to the time which elapsed while he was in prison only as to such part of that time as access to the federal courts was not freely available to state prisoners. We remanded the case to the District Court for findings in that regard.

Since this opinion was rendered on April 21, 1980, the Supreme Court, on May 19, 1980, decided Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, Et Al. v. Tomanio, ___ U.S. ___, 100 S.Ct. 1790, 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980).

We are now of the opinion that under the teachings of Tomanio the prisoner was entitled to the benefit of a Texas tolling statute according to its express terms.

Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is GRANTED and the decision of the District Court dismissing the petition is reversed.

The case is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MILLER v. SMITH
(Aug 28, 1980)