Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GWINNETT COMMERCIAL BANK et al. v. KALB et al.

CLARKE, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case on the question of whether or not certain evidence in defense of a suit on a note was barred by the parol evidence rule. The Court of Appeals held the evidence admissible. Kalb v. Gwinnett Commercial Bank, 153 Ga. App. 833 ( 267 S.E.2d 258) (1980). In reaching its decision, the Court of Appeals relied on their ruling in Henry v. Cobb Bank c. Co., 151 Ga. App. 725 ( 261 S.E.2d 459) (1979).

This court granted certiorari and reversed the decision in Henry in Cobb Bank c. Co. v. Henry, 246 Ga. 225 (1980). Since the issues raised in this appeal are the same as those in Cobb Bank and Trust Company, that case is controlling of our opinion here. Therefore, the opinion below is reversed insofar as it relies on the Court of Appeals' ruling in Henry that the evidence in support of the alleged defenses was not barred by the parol evidence rule.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur, except Marshall, J., who concurs in the judgment only.

ARGUED JULY 7, 1980 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 4, 1980.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GWINNETT COMMERCIAL BANK v. KALB
(Sep 4, 1980)