Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STANLEY v. THE STATE.

CARLEY, Judge.

Appellant appeals his conviction of motor vehicle theft. Appellant's counsel has filed a motion in this court requesting permission to withdraw from the case.

In compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 ( 87 SC 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493) (1967), and Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 ( 229 S.E.2d 406) (1976), we have conducted a full and careful examination of the record and transcript of this case to determine whether the appeal is, in fact, wholly frivolous. We find that it is. The requirements of Anders v. California, supra, have thus been met and appellant's counsel is, accordingly, granted permission to withdraw.

Our review of the record discloses no basis whatever for reversal. A rational trior of fact could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at trial proof of appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979); Strozier v. State 145 Ga. App. 566 ( 244 S.E.2d 89) (1978); Sweatt v. State, 149 Ga. App. 717 ( 256 S.E.2d 28) (1979).

Judgment affirmed. Quillian, P. J., and Shulman, J., concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 16, 1980.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STANLEY v. STATE
(Oct 16, 1980)