Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF OREGON, Appellant-Petitioner, v. LEO ALEXANDER, Respondent-Petitioner. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant-Petitioner,

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its decision.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

TANZER, J., Specially Concurring.

In this case, the continuing validity of State v. Brown, 262 Or. 442, 497 P.2d 1191 (1972), is placed squarely in issue. I would reach the issue, and I concur based upon the reasons given in my concurring opinion in State v. Knowles, 289 Or. 803, 618 P.2d 1245 (1980).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. ALEXANDER
(Oct 21, 1980)