Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Anthony M. PIMENTAL, III v. GOLDMAN, BIAFORE HINES et al.

ORDER

This case comes before us on defendants' motion to affirm a judgment of the Superior Court which dismissed plaintiff's action on the ground that he failed to file more responsive answers to interrogatories as ordered by the court. Oral argument on said motion was heard November 3, 1980. After considering the memorandum in support of said motion, as well as the points raised in oral argument, we find that plaintiff's appeal is without merit and therefore we grant the motion to affirm in accordance with Rule 16(g) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. The case may be remitted to the Superior Court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PIMENTAL, III v. GOLDMAN, BIAFORE HINES
(Nov 5, 1980)