Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of CHARLES MILLER et al., Appellants, v. FRANK WARD et al., Constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of East Fishkill, Respondents.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of that court.

We find no merit to the contention that in denying appellants' application for a special permit to conduct soil mining the zoning board of appeals was precluded from considering evidence of the prospective inability of the applicant to comply with the operating standards prescribed in the zoning ordinance. There is evidence in the record to support the board's determination that the elaborated standards of the ordinance had not been met in full, and there is no merit to appellants' contention that the board's decision was improperly based on material outside the record.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MILLER v. WARD
(Nov 11, 1980)