AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of the Claim of JAMES M. KRAUSS, Appellant, v. HUDSON PAINTING CORP. et al., Respondents. WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed May 11, 1978. Claimant sustained a work-related back injury in 1953 for which he received compensation. In 1968, his injury was classified as a permanent partial disability, compensation was awarded based upon a 40% loss of earning capacity and the case was closed. Thereafter, the case was reopened and restored to the Referee's Calendar on several occasions, based upon claimant's allegation that he was totally disabled. The decision appealed from states: "Upon review of the record the Board Panel finds that the claimant has not produced any medical evidence of an increase in his causally related disability." Medical reports in the record indicate that, in addition to the back injury, claimant had a number of chronic ailments, including obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema and arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The board's decision is supported by substantial evidence and must, therefore, be affirmed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF KRAUSS v. HUDSON PAINTING CORP
(Dec 24, 1980)