Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EUBANKS v. THE STATE.

SHULMAN, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction of the offense of burglary. We affirm.

Although appellant failed to submit any enumerations of error (with a brief in support thereof), we have nevertheless reviewed the record to determine whether or not the verdict and judgment withstand a general grounds objection. Having found sufficient evidence of defendant's culpability upon which a jury could reasonably have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense charged, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560).

Judgment affirmed. Quillian, C. J., and Carley, J., concur.

SHULMAN, Presiding Judge.

DECIDED JANUARY 8, 1981 — REHEARING DENIED JANUARY 22, 1981.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EUBANKS v. STATE
(Jan 8, 1981)