Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LARRY PICKETT, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We agree with the Appellate Division that it was not constitutionally required that defendant be represented by counsel at the lineup, which was conducted at an investigatory, prearraignment stage in the proceedings (cf. People v Coleman, 43 N.Y.2d 222). Although the record indicates that at the time this procedure took place defendant was in custody on an unrelated robbery offense, that fact does not acquire significance where, contrary to what was said in the opinion below, there is no assertion by the defendant, nor any indication in the record submitted that defendant was then represented by counsel on either charge.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PICKETT
(Jan 20, 1981)