AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

CAROLYN ENG, Respondent, v. THOMAS DI CARLO, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. STERLING INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 15, 1979, which granted plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements payable to plaintiff by appellant. Plaintiff's time to serve the amended complaint is extended until 20 days after service upon her of copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof. The passage of time alone, without a further showing of prejudice, is insufficient to deny leave to amend a pleading (see Cerrato v. Crown Co., 58 A.D.2d 721; Yerdon v. Baldwinsville Academy, 39 A.D.2d 824), particularly where, as here, the proposed amendment merely changes the theory of recovery without alleging any new facts (see Cerrato v. Crown Co., supra; Handley v. Mirro Aluminum Co., 52 A.D.2d 1029; Rife v. Union Coll., 30 A.D.2d 504). No prejudice has been shown which would warrant denial of the motion to amend. Titone, J.P., Lazer, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ENG v. DI CARLO
(Jan 26, 1981)