Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LEWIS E. BLACKBURN, APPELLANT, v. J. FRANK BLACKBURN, APPELLEE.

SCHEB, Chief Judge.

J. Frank Blackburn filed an action for replevin against appellant Lewis E. Blackburn. Appellant filed his answer and counterclaim incorporating a demand for jury trial. He renewed the demand at pretrial conference. The court, nevertheless, denied the demand, conducted a nonjury trial and entered final judgment for Frank Blackburn. In this appeal the appellant challenges the trial court's denial of his demand for jury trial.

A litigant has a right to a jury trial when the issue presented in a case would have been heard at common law. Carney v. Stringfellow, 73 Fla. 700, 74 So. 866 (1917); see Dudley v. Harrison, McCready Co., 127 Fla. 687, 173 So. 820 (1937); In re U.S. Financial Services Litigation, 609 F.2d 411 (9th Cir. 1979). Replevin was a commonlaw action. Three States Lumber Co. v. Blanks, 133 F. 479 (6th Cir. 1904); Road Material and Equipment Co. v. McGowan, 229 Miss. 611, 91 So.2d 554 (1956). Consequently, a party in a replevin action is entitled to a jury trial as long as he timely demands it and does not waive the right. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.430.

Here, appellant filed a timely demand under rule 1.430(b) for a jury trial in his answer and counterclaim. Further, the record does not indicate that he ever waived that right. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a jury trial on all issues triable by jury.

GRIMES and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BLACKBURN v. BLACKBURN
(Jan 30, 1981)