AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

LAWRENCE FREUNDLICH et al., Respondents, v. TOWN BOARD OF SOUTHAMPTON et al., Defendants, and OCEAN CREEK ASSOCIATES et al., Appellants.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Appellate Division that the respondents violated the town ordinance by altering lot lines in an approved subdivision without following the mandated procedures. The lot lines on the revised plan under which the lots were to be sold were at variance with those on the first subdivision which was approved by the town planning board. It follows, therefore, that this attempted resubdivision is invalid (see Town of Southampton Rules and Regulations for Subdivision of Land, § 218, § 300 et seq.).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FREUNDLICH v. TOWN BOARD OF SOUTHAMPTON
(Feb 10, 1981)