AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LUIS PAPO, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 4, 1979, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. Defendant was charged with the stabbing death of a fellow employee during an altercation at work. He originally entered a plea of guilty to the indictment, but the plea was subsequently withdrawn. At trial, the defendant was cross-examined with respect to statements made by him during the plea. This was error. It is well settled that a guilty plea, once withdrawn, "is out of the case forever and for all purposes" (see People v Spitaleri, 9 N.Y.2d 168, 173; see, also, People v. Droz, 39 N.Y.2d 457; People v. Burd, 18 N.Y.2d 447). The fact that this error occurred on defendant's cross-examination, rather than on the prosecutor's direct case, is of no legal significance (see People v. Heffron, 59 A.D.2d 263). Damiani, J.P., Gibbons, Margett and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PAPO
(Feb 17, 1981)