Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DAVID L. SHEPARD, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BEAIRD-POULAN, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING (Opinion May 14, 1980, 5 Cir., 1980, 617 F.2d 87).

PER CURIAM:

In light of intervening decisions, including Satterwhite v. City of Greenville, 5th Cir. 1981, 634 F.2d 231, (En Banc Decision on Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States); Armour v. City of Anniston, 622 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1980) (On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States), the case is remanded to the district court to determine whether there exists a live controversy involving the proposed class; if so, whether Mr. Shepard is a proper class representative; if not, whether an appropriate class representative wishes to be appointed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHEPARD v. BEAIRD-POULAN, INC
(Mar 2, 1981)