Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF UTAH, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, v. CARAL LEE OWENS AND RUDELL OWENS, DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS.

MAUGHAN, Chief Justice:

The Utah County Attorney brings this appeal from the District Court's granting of the defendants' motion to quash the information. The record reveals the appeal was exclusively taken by the County Attorney in the name of the State and does not indicate that he was rendering assistance as requested by the Attorney General in relation to the appeal. In our recent decision in State v. Loddy, Utah, 618 P.2d 60 (1980), we concluded such actions to be beyond the authority of the County Attorney. Following that decision the present appeal is dismissed.

HALL, HOWE, STEWART and OAKS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. OWENS
(Mar 10, 1981)